A History and Critique of Methodological Naturalism
The Philosophical Case for God’s Design of Nature
- Apologetics
- Publisher: Wipf and Stock
- Published: 2016
FritzSearch.com earns a commission on purchases made through Bookshop.org links.
Publisher's Description
Methodological naturalism is the thesis that only natural features can be factored into any legitimate explanation. Moreover, the thesis contends, any attempt to explain natural phenomena by appealing to supernatural features is unscientific and, therefore, illegitimate. This book argues that nothing inherently problematic afflicts possible appeals to supernatural agency in the attempt to explain select phenomena in nature. Reputable philosophers of the ancient and medieval periods, as well as prominent scientists of the early modern era, invoked supernatural agency in their attempts to understand nature. For them, miraculous interventions in nature by a supernatural agent were not unreasonable. However, the super-naturalistic worldview has been replaced by methodological naturalism. The assumptions of two pivotal figures--David Hume and Charles Darwin--brought about this change. This book shows that this change was motivated by unscientific means. Hence, the change itself remains inconsistent with the assumptions of methodological naturalism.
Endorsements (2)
“Dr. Joseph Okello's presentation on the history and critique of naturalism reflects the clarity of his thinking and the convincing logic of his argument that an unqualified naturalism fails to embrace the larger and more rational comprehension of nature. In our postmodern culture, with its expectation of a more inclusive and relational interpretation of life, this book shows that naturalism fails to account for a more inclusive vision of reality and its larger relational context.”
“The assumption that supernatural explanations have no place in science is common among many today. In this informative and stimulating book, Okello not only demonstrates that this assumption is philosophically flawed, he also shows that supernatural explanations have played a prominent role throughout the history of science. But Okello also insists that appealing to God is not a substitute for the task of unearthing scientific explanations. The book is an important voice in the debate.”
See something wrong on this page? Report a problem