Skip to main content
Cover of James in Postcolonial Perspective

James in Postcolonial Perspective

The Letter as Nativist Discourse

  • Biblical Studies & Commentaries
  • Publisher: Augsburg Fortress
  • Published: 2015

FritzSearch.com earns a commission on purchases made through Bookshop.org links.

Publisher's Description

James confronts the exploitive wealthy; it also opposes Pauline hybridity. K. Jason Coker argues that postcolonial theory and the theoretical perspectives of Aimé Césaire, Frantz Fanon, and Ngugi wa Thiong’o allow us to understand how these themes converge in the letter. The emphasis in James, which Coker argues is a genuine, early letter from Jerusalem, upon purity and moral perfection functions as nativist discourse that constructs a pious identity by simultaneously opposing the exploitation of the Roman Empire and a peculiar Pauline form of hybridity that compromises with it. James refutes Roman cultural practices such as the patronage system and economic practices that threaten the identity of the letter’s recipients. At the same time, James condemns those who would transgress the boundaries between purity and impurity, God and “world,” as “whores,” “sinners,” and “two-faced.”


Endorsements (0)

No endorsements on record.

See something wrong on this page? Report a problem